Saturday, January 12, 2013

The Ice Man, Radioactive

Original Link: http://inthesetimes.com/article/14033/the_ice_man_radioactive/

By Greg Palast


Harold Simmons: the GOP’s $50 million man.

When the Ice Man told Karl Rove, “I’m in,” he wasn’t fooling around. The Ice Man, Texan Harold Simmons, is one of the largest donors to the Republican Party. The Ice Man, who got his nickname for his merciless, cold-hearted tactics as a corporate raider, said he expects to give $36 million to Republican candidates in 2012. Add in what he’s giving Karl Rove’s Super PAC and it goes to over $50 million for the year. Of course, that’s peanuts for a man worth more than $7 billion.

In the Republican primary, Simmons gave $1.2 million to presidential candidate Rick Santorum to attack Mitt Romney. And he gave nearly a million dollars to Restore Our Future, the pro-Romney Super PAC, to buy ads to attack Newt Gingrich. He gave $1.1 million to Newt Gingrich to attack Santorum and Romney. He gave their opponent Rick Perry’s Super PAC yet another million to let the governor of Texas make a jackass of himself on national TV.

What is the Ice Man up to, giving each one of these guys enough money to beat the hell out of the other? I can’t claim to know everything in the Ice Man’s head. He’s playing multidimensional chess when I’m playing checkers. But, at the least, I know he’s teaching all the candidates to heel, roll over and beg.

He certainly didn’t give a rat’s ass about the candidates’ positions on the hot-button issue of the primary, abortion and contraceptives. Simmons thinks all of them are nuts: He’s pro-choice. It’s not about philosophy, but, as Michael Corleone says in The Godfather, “It’s just business.”

Simmons is the King of Filth. I don’t mean porn. Two of his big businesses today are NL Industries and Waste Control Specialists LLC. Their value is dependent on government gimmes and rules: permits, environmental regulations, and the handling of poisons and taxes, of course—but most important, the law of torts.

His $50 million for Rove and Republicans is less than 1 percent of his wealth. As his candidates’ tax and business proposals could boost his net worth by $2 billion, his return on investment could top 4,000 percent on just those two pieces of real estate called the White House and the Capitol. Not bad.

One investment, the $1.2 million Simmons put into Gov. Rick Perry’s campaign for president, is already paying off. The key for Simmons was that Perry’s run for president belly-flopped. The Ice Man is no fool: He knew his fellow Texan was a putz, and would crash and burn in the first presidential debates. And if that governor ends up back in the statehouse in Texas, that governor knows who’s pleasured his campaign treasury.

Perry’s loony run for the White House, once finished, meant that Perry remains governor of Texas, exactly where the Ice Man needs him. Why? The Ice Man’s Waste Control Specialists LLC wants to create a 20-square-mile toxic dump in West Texas. But it was a dump without a hole. The business zoomed in value once the state of Texas gave Simmons a hole for his waste dump. Permits for the crapola were issued despite objections of the state’s own expert panel, which said the hole was too close to the giant Ogallala aquifer, the very same water source that Obama tried to save by moving the XL Pipeline. It’s a drinking water source for eight states.

Nevertheless, the political hacks on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality appointed by Perry overruled their experts and in 2008 and 2009 issued the Ice Man the licenses for his dump.

In March 2012, after flunked-out presidential candidate Perry skulked back to the Texas governor’s mansion, another one of his agencies approved Ice Man’s superdump to take in nuclear waste. Now, toxic dumps have a habit of leaking and causing cancers. If this one leaks it could poison and irradiate the Ogallala.

And that leads to lawsuits. No problemo, pardner! Perry supported a voter referendum and lobbying campaign, backed by $2 million from a group called Texans for Lawsuit Reform, which virtually eliminated the ability of Texans to sue for pain and suffering if they are dying of cancer from negligently leaked toxins. The $2 million for the “reformers” came from the Ice Man.

For the Ice Man Simmons, this is a twofer. Simmons controls NL Industries, a name that beats the hell out of “National Lead,” its old name, whose most well-known product was the popular Dutch Boy paint. The paint’s brilliant colors were attributed to its special ingredient: lead.

The Ice Man took over the company in 1986. But there was a threat to the Ice Man’s cash kitty in NL. According to the industry’s own research, lead-based paint causes severe mental retardation in poor neighborhoods where the poison is peeling off the walls.

In New York, Ana Amparo’s son suffered “brain injuries, cognitive deficits, learning disabilities, reduction of intelligence, behavioral and attention disorders.” When he was 16, forensic tests traced the problem back to lead paint whose chemical tags pointed to NL’s Dutch Boy.

The key for Simmons to keep his billions out of the hands of NL’s victims is “tort reform”—Corporate America’s campaign to take away an injured person’s right to sue.

Simmons appears to have bought himself protection from lawsuits by the victims of his enterprises in Texas, and he’s made clear he wants to take his push for protection from his victims on the road to all 50 states.
When the lead-head isn’t fighting brain-damaged children, Simmons is fighting taxpayers. Simmons’ company has refused to pay its share of the $500 million a year it costs to remove lead-contaminated paint from schoolhouses.

The regulations that banned lead from paint in the 1970s prevented thousands of cases of mental retardation. This makes Simmons crazy: he wants to eliminate all government environmental regulation—a philosophy you could call “Lucrative Libertarianism.”

The Ice Man’s long-term goal is to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, in 2012, Rove’s dogsbody, Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Ark.), sponsored H.R. 4078, the Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act, “to provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent.”

But what’s the use of a bill without a Congress to pass it, or a president to sign it?

As Simmons’ ally corporate superlobbyist Grover Norquist put it, they just need a president “with enough working digits to handle a pen … to sign the legislation that has already been prepared.”

Prepared by Grover and the Ice Man.

And that’s what the $50 million in donations is for.


Monday, January 7, 2013

Adelson gave $40 million to super PACs in final weeks of election

Original Link: http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/12/21/11950/adelson-gave-40-million-super-pacs-final-weeks-election

By

Top 25 donors supplied more than a third of super PAC cash

Billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and family poured nearly $40 million into the coffers of GOP-aligned super PACs In the final three weeks of the 2012 campaign, bringing their total giving to the groups to more than $93 million.

Adelson ranks as the top donor to the outside spending groups by a wide margin, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis of campaign finance records.

Super PACs raised roughly $830 million in the 2012 election, with conservative groups accounting for about 60 percent of the total, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.
By contrast, President Barack Obama’s presidential campaign raised nearly $720 million and Republican challenger Mitt Romney’s raised almost $450 million, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

In all, the top 25 super PAC super donors doled out more than $310 million, about 37 percent of all super PAC receipts, according to the Center’s analysis of data from the FEC and Center for Responsive Politics. Ninety-one individuals gave at least $1 million to super PACs and collectively donated more than $330 million, according to the analysis.

The unlimited donations, which are used primarily to fund candidate attack ads, concern advocates such as Stephen Spaulding, staff counsel at Common Cause.

“People are able to distort the political process, open doors and be kingmakers simply because of the size of their bank account,” he said. “The threat of the spending just hangs over all the political decisions that are happening on [Capitol] Hill.”

After focusing primarily on the presidential contest, in the final weeks of the campaign, Adelson ramped up his giving to GOP-aligned super PACs active in House and Senate races.

In Virginia alone, Adelson invested $4 million into a super PAC that ran attack ads against Democrat Tim Kaine in the final days of the election.

His million-dollar contribution to a super PAC called the “Hardworking Americans Committee” accounted for the bulk of the money used in an unsuccessful last-ditch effort to defeat incumbent Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.

And a GOP-aligned super PAC known as the “America 360 Committee” received $500,000 from the Adelsons as it touted incumbent Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and criticized Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren in telephone calls and mailings.

Despite the spending, however, Democrats prevailed in the most contentious races — including battles for U.S. Senate seats in Massachusetts and Virginia.

Adelson’s donations to super PACs — which can accept unlimited donations from individuals, corporations and unions — set a new standard in political giving.

Texas businessman Harold Simmons, the billionaire owner of Contran Corp., ranked a distant second among super donors, giving $30.9 million, including donations from his company and wife, Annette Simmons.

One of Simmons' business ventures includes a site in West Texas built to store nuclear waste. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently debating rules that could result in sizeable contracts for Simmons' company.

Another Texan, millionaire Bob Perry, ranked third, giving $23.5 million to conservative super PACs. Perry is the owner of Perry Homes and an advocate for the business-led effort to limit damages awarded in lawsuits.

Millionaires and billionaires pepper the Center’s list of the top 25 super donors. The list also includes seven unions and the Republican Governors Association, a so-called “527 committee” that used a super PAC to direct funds into state races. None of these donors broke the $20 million mark.

Billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, No. 9, was a new addition to the list.
Bloomberg gave more than $10 million to a group he launched called Independence USA PAC, whose priorities include stronger gun control laws and marriage equality for same-sex couples.
Other new additions to the Center’s list of top donors include:
 •William S. Rose, Jr., No. 6, the 61-year-old attorney tied to two companies that gave more than $12 million to conservative super PAC FreedomWorks for America since the beginning of October;
 •the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, No. 12 at $8.2 million;
 •the American Federation of Teachers, No. 15 at $5.8 million; and
 •the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing, Pipefitting and Sprinkler Fitting Industry, tied for 23rd at $4.2 million.

Rose’s companies — Specialty Investments Group, Inc., and Kingston Pike Development, LLC— both list their address as Rose’s $634,000 private home outside of Knoxville, Tenn. Both were registered with the state of Tennessee in late September, and neither have websites.

Rose, after intense press scrutiny, went public saying Specialty’s mission is to "buy, sell, develop and invest in a variety of real estate ventures and investments." Rose released a lengthy press release, but did not indicate where the money for the donations originated.

Rose did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

The top Democratic-aligned super donor was Chicago media mogul Fred Eychaner, who gave $14.1 million over the course of the election cycle, split among five groups. That sum earned him the No. 4 spot on the Center’s top 25 list.

The pro-Obama Priorities USA Action super PAC collected $4.5 million from Eychaner, ranking as his top beneficiary. He also backed Majority PAC, House Majority PAC, Women Vote!, the super PAC of abortion rights advocacy group EMILY’s List, and America Votes Action Fund, a super PAC that funded get-out-the-vote efforts.

Liberal billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros* made it on the list, donating about $2.8 million split among four Democratic groups. His children Andrea, Alexander and Jonathan also each donated six-figure sums to Democratic super PACs, as did his daughter-in-law Melissa, bringing the family’s total giving to $5.1 million, enough to rank 18th.

Soros' children collectively gave $1.1 million to the pro-campaign finance reform super PAC "Friends of Democracy," which was launched by Jonathan Soros.

This is a far cry from the $23.7 million Soros donated during the 2004 election to 527 groups — the predecessors of super PACs — when he ranked as the top 527 committee financier, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Despite fears to the contrary, donations from blue-chip corporations were rare, although a month before the election, Chevron, the third-largest American company according to Forbes, donated $2.5 million to a Republican super PAC closely allied with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

One of the largest, high-profile corporate donors was Weaver Holdings, the parent company of the Indiana-popcorn company known for its brands “Pop Weaver” and “Trail’s End,” which is sold by Boy Scouts across the country. Weaver Holdings, along with Weaver Popcorn, donated $3.4 million to American Crossroads, including $1 million during the final three weeks of the election.
American Crossroads was co-founded by GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie.

Unlike traditional political action committees, there is no limit on contributions to super PACs. They emerged following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision and a federal court ruling called SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission.

Adelson is a staunch ally of Israel and an opponent of unions. He first hit the news when he and his relatives pumped more than $16 million into a super PAC that supported former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s failed bid for the Republican nomination for president.

He and his wife Miriam gave $30 million to the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future, which accounted for nearly 20 percent of the nearly $154 million raised by the group.

In late October, the Adelsons also gave $23 million to American Crossroads, their first donations to the group. Crossroads spent more than $90 million in an unsuccessful effort to help Romney oust Obama.

Roughly two-thirds of Adelson’s $93 million went to super PACs that backed just one or two specific candidates. None of Adelson’s preferred candidates prevailed in any of the 10 races in which these super PACs were active.

Earlier this month, a defiant Adelson told the Wall Street Journal that he would spend even more money in future elections.

"I happen to be in a unique business where winning and losing is the basis of the entire business," Adelson told the newspaper. "I don't cry when I lose. There's always a new hand coming up."

RankNameTotal GivenIdeology
1Sheldon Adelson & family (see profile)$93.3 millionRepublican
2Harold Simmons & wife, companies (see profile)$30.9 millionRepublican
3Bob Perry (see profile)$23.5 millionRepublican
4Fred Eychaner (see profile)$14.1 millionDemocratic
5Joe Ricketts (see profile)$13.1 millionRepublican
6William S. Rose (Specialty Group) (see profile) $12.1 millionRepublican
7United Auto Workers (see profile)$11.8 millionDemocratic
8National Education Association (see profile)$10.8 millionDemocratic
9Michael Bloomberg (see profile)$10 millionIndependent
10Republican Governors Association (see profile)$9.8 millionRepublican
11James H. Simons (see profile)$9.6 millionDemocratic
12AFSCME (see profile) $8.2 millionDemocratic
13AFL-CIO (see profile)$7.4 millionDemocratic
14Robert B. Rowling (see profile) $6.1 millionRepublican
15American Federation of Teachers (see profile) $5.8 millionDemocratic
16Robert Mercer (see profile) $5.5 millionRepublican
17Steve and Amber Mostyn (see profile) $5.2 millionDemocratic
18George Soros* & family (see profile)$5.1 millionDemocratic
19William Koch (see profile) $4.8 millionRepublican
20Peter Thiel (see profile) $4.7 millionRepublican
21SEIU (see profile) $4.4 millionDemocratic
21Joe Craft (see profile) $4.4 millionRepublican
23John Childs (see profile) $4.2 millionRepublican
23Plumbers and Pipefitters Union (see profile)$4.2 millionDemocratic
25Jerry Perenchio (see profile) $4.1 millionRepublican
*George Soros is the chairman of the Open Society Foundation, which provides funding for the Center for Public Integrity. See a list of the Center's donors.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Koch Industries two bossmen-owners Charles & David Koch created the Tea Party

Original Link: http://neo-nazi--teaparty--kkk.blogspot.com/2011/04/koch-industries-two-bossmen-owners.html

Koch Industries two bossmen-owners Charles & David Koch created the Tea Party. David is a twin, and his twin brother has called him and Koch Industries "Organized Crime" on CBS TV without getting sued for slander. Well with over $55,000,000 in CRIMINAL FINES for polluting six states water, air and soil, you can call Koch Industries "Organized Crime", not to mention the $293,000,000 jury award to the parents of Danielle Dawn Smalley for her being killed by Koch negligence while the brothers played politics.

In 2004 David Koch had to hide the Citizen's for a Sound Economy because the heat was on exposing their partnership in the RICO Tobacco Racketeering conviction of seven major tobacco organized crime operations. CSE was merged with dying Jack Kemp's "Empower America" mailing list and resurrected as "Freedomworks". The Marlboro Man in the Stetson hat at CSE was Dick Armey, former Republican congress leader from Texas who oversaw CSE's tobacco propaganda efforts, while KKK-hero Tom Posey (of Civilian Military Assistance fame) was treasurer of CSE, at the time that CSE morphed into Freedomworks.

Freedomworks owns the LOGO graphic of the Tea Party Patriots, and owns the trademark f the Tea Party Patriots, according to front-spokesperson Amy Kremer.

Freedomworks owned and controlled the stage for Rupert Murdock's 9-12 DC project fronted by Foxman Glenn Beck. Koch brothers and Murdock worked together at least from the time that Phillip Morris Tobacco Company Board member Murdoch was also sitting on the Board of Directors of Cato Institute sitting side-by-side with board member David Koch planning Cato propaganda operations for the Tobacco Mafia since convicted in federal court for RICO racketeering. The Marlboro Men Rupert Murdoch and David Koch carried out the Tea Party scam using Fox Newz to cover every whistlestop of the Tea Party Express bus tour cross country with small rallies of CSE-Empower-America email list members exhorted to show up for TV camera facetime at these stops. The OILMEN Koch's run a fleet of buses, from Hot Air anti-global-warming, to hand's off my healthcare, to Tea Party troops bused to rallies. They also run a fleet of websites, over 400 different ones from one server at the Koch-Americans for Koch-Prosperity offices.

All The Koch's Men: Anatomy of a right-wing media smear

Original Link: https://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/anatomy-of-a-right-wing-smear

By Yasha Levine

Earlier this month, we learned that Fox News contributor Steven "Dickless" Crowder doctored a Fox News segment to supposedly show him being punched in the face unprovoked by a rampaging union protester at an anti-Right to Work rally in Michigan.

This alleged union thug looked to be way past his retirement age, but the video showed Crowder cowering in fear. Later, like a true wuss, Crowder explained that he would've used his deadly martial arts skills to incapacitate the attacker, but felt "that if I would have defended myself I would have been killed where I stood."

As fate would have it, Crowder's attempt to demonize unions was inadvertently thwarted by his own people at Fox News: Sean Hannity's producers accidentally aired an unedited clip of Crowder's altercation clearly showing that the unnamed union assailant had actually been shoved to the ground and violently provoked into the fight. Crowder himself later admitted that he'd earlier been involved in "pushing" union activists.

But by the time someone caught Hannity's slip-up, the damage had been done: a Fox News segment showing union thugs attacking a reporter had been beamed to every corner of the right-wing media world. Even Michigan police took the episode seriously, and have opened an investigation into the attack.

Stepping back from "Dickless" Crowder's rank publicity stunt, the question arises: Have you ever wondered how these right-wing media stunts get started? The more cynical among us have long assumed that they're planned out in advance, and that people like "Dickless" Crowder are just trained monkeys acting on orders from on high.

But who comes up with the ideas? Who generates these things? Who funds them? And what do the brainstorming sessions look like?

Finally, we have some answers.

For the first time we have concrete evidence showing exactly how these types of media stunts are created: a series of leaked emails showing how a right-wing mega-donor and a couple of high-ranking GOP strategists hatch a plan to "expose" union-organized voter registration fraud. In the space of one long email discussion, they hash out all the details of the operation before giving orders — and money — to the late, lamented Andrew Breitbart, and his employee James O'Keefe, to carry our their plan.

It's an amazing thread, laying bare the degree to which wealthy right-wing donors personally involve themselves in the nuts and bolts planning of these operations. The emails also show right-wing muckraker-heroes O'Keefe and Breitbart for what they really are (or were): paid lackeys and fetch boys for billionaires.

First the hard facts:

These emails were obtained by a very credible source who I know personally, but who would like to remain anonymous. Lets call him "Breitbart's Deep Throat." They show the planning of a video sting to expose voter fraud by the SEIU during the 2010 special U.S. Senate election in Massachusetts 2010, which was held to replace the seat vacated by death of Senator Ted Kennedy.

Some of these emails were first published by BuzzFeed in September 2012. But BuzzFeed being BuzzFeed, they fucked up their own scoop, failing to put the emails into proper context, failing even to arrange the leaked emails in chronological order to make sense of what's going on. That's what NSFWCORP is doing here now. We're also publishing exclusive material never before made public.
So let's begin...

The email triggering the SEIU operation came from John Fund, who at the time was a columnist for the Wall Street Journal and is now a senior editor at the American Spectator, as well as a Fox News contributor. Fund, who received his journalism training at the tobacco-funded National Journalism Center, was an early crusader for stricter voter ID laws designed to make it more difficult for minorities and poor people to vote—a sort of modern version of the old school Jim Crow poll taxes and literacy tests.

On the morning of Tuesday, January 12, 2010, John Fund wrote an email to another right-wing operative by the name of Michael Thielen.

Thielen serves as the executive director of the Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA), a GOP organization set up in 1985 with the primary purpose of digging up fake instances of voter fraud and using the courts to restrict minority votes. During Bush’s reelection campaign in 2004, members of the RNLA cooked up a false racist scandal, accusing the NAACP of using crack cocaine to lure black voters to vote.

That's the kind of stuff Thielen's been involved in. In 2010, he helped John Fund and Fox News promote a fake scandal about "New Black Panthers" paramilitary units being deployed at polling stations during the 2008 presidential election to intimidate and threaten white voters—presumably on behalf of Barack Obama himself.

So in January 2010, Fund sent the following email to Thielen that was short and to the point. It concerned a “tip” from a "reliable" source that warned of a plot by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to round up “black or brown” folk in several regions of Massachusetts and to “rope” them into committing voter fraud on behalf of the Democratic party.
Note that the email came Fund’s Wall Street Journal company account. (Proprietor: Rupert Murdoch.)
Subject: FW: John Batchelor
From: "Fund, John"
Date: Tue, January 12, 2010 8:25 am
To:'Michael Thielen'
Tip from Boston source (normally reliable)
Seiu contracting for buses on election day and heading to roxbury, mattapan, roslindale and jamaica plain. If you're black or brown they'll rope you in and take you to the polls, registration can be worked out.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
The email also arrived in the inbox of Heather Higgins, a well-connected figure in the world of right-wing policy, advocacy and media. She’s a former colleague of Fund’s at the Wall Street Journal and the CEO of Independent Women's Forum, an anti-feminist "free market" outfit that used to share office space with the Kochs’ Americans for Prosperity. Among other things, Higgins’ group has opposed equal pay legislation for women, and argued that women are less likely to vote for politicians who support government healthcare.

Higgins has a direct line of communication to major right-wing moneymen, including the billionaire investor and Koch-aligned mega-donor Foster Friess. And that's exactly who she contacted about the stunt.

In her note to Friess, Higgins got right to point: she asked for money, and described the operation as a "non-glamorous but highly effective" push to get out the vote for the GOP and “a great opportunity to making trouble in the best sort of way.”
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Heather Higgins wrote:
Foster --
See below from John Fund re SEIU - Acorn is in MA as well. It would be hugely helpful if you would assist with our non-glamorous but highly effective GOTV effort. If you could possibly let me know today, that would be helpful to our planning. This is such a great opportunity for making trouble in the best sort of way - I hope you can help us really capitalize on it.
Many thanks,
Heather
Who is Foster Friess?

Friess is almost always pictured wearing a ten-gallon hat and likes to refer to himself as an "underdog billionaire.” He made his money in finance and is a major Republican donor. He’s also a hardcore born-again Christian and Islamophobe, who's blamed liberals for the Columbine shooting and suggested on TV that women get abortions by putting aspirin pills "between their knees." Friess backed Mitt Romney for president in 2008, funded Rick Santorum's presidential run in 2012 and considers the billionaire Koch brothers to be "a national treasure.”

But Friess doesn’t just fund political campaigns. Like the Kochs, he has a long term outlook and understands the power of ideas and the need to fund projects that change the way people think. Friess has also been deeply involved in the push to break unions and privatize public education.
Foster Friess didn't reply to Higgins directly, but his son Steven did.

Steve Friess helps run his dad’s political operations. He also serves on the board of Alliance for School Choice, one of the most powerful and successful charter school/teachers union-busting organizations in the country, and funded in large part by the Walton family.

Steve Friess answered Heather Higgins’s email less than 12 hours after she sent it. He loved the idea, and had suggestions about how it should be carried out, proposing that some "black /Latina conservatives" should be wired for video and that a couple of “private detective types" should be hired to do recon on the bus route. Steve asked his dad to get Breitbart on the job, and wistfully wondered if this operation was “too much to dream?”
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Steve Friess wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if a "ACORN sting video" could be produced about these busses?
Dad - maybe bounce this off Breitbart?
Some black /Latina conservatives could be wired for video, and get picked up on one of these busses, and show what goes on. My guess - they are offering cash, (which I am pretty sure is illegal), and I also would wager that at least some of these busses are making more than one stop with the same people - ie getting them to vote twice - though I don't know the mechanics of that.
Perhaps some private detective types would be needed to help track down the busses, and a block or two ahead of them to drop our cameramen off...
Too much to dream? Imagine pulling this off - legal / image problems for SEIU would be a good thing... think there's upside to this?
Breitbart would know, and Fund would know - 'if we catch them doing X, it could mean Y' - I just don't know what the stakes are...
If you’ve ever wondered what billionaire heirs dream about, what excites them and keeps them going... Well, there’s your answer. They dream of crushing unions and robbing workers of their healthcare and pensions, and drool just thinking about slashing their meager wages.

The email also shows that active right-wing donors like the Friess family don't delegate this kind of work to hired media operatives, but personally involve themselves in the planning of media smear operations—and seem to relish every moment.

With such enthusiasm coming from the likes of billionaire aristo-brat Steve Friess, the SEIU operation was a go.

That same day, Heather Higgins introduced Friess' plan to Breitbart and O'Keefe. Higgins CC'ed the email to Foster Friess and again brought up the issue of funding, saying "you all should talk."
From: Heather Higgins
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Subject: Re: brainstorm of sorts, here - far-fetched? Maybe not?...
To: Steve Friess, jamesokeefeiii@xxxxxx.com , andrew@breitbart.com
Cc: Foster Friess
Andrew and James, I'm forwarding what could be a very clever idea from Steve Friess in response to the intel below from John Fund re SEIU's intentions in Tuesday's election in MA. Don't know what it would cost, but you all should talk.
Warmest regards -
Heather Higgins
The next portion of the email thread is missing, but, whatever happened next, the money and logistics must have been quickly hammered out and given priority status.

Later that same day—a mere 16 hours after Steven Friess ok’d the operation—James O'Keefe was already hard at work.

O'Keefe is best known for the video hit job he did on ACORN, an organization deeply hated by the Republican right because of its success registering black voters. The media whack job was carried out in 2009, with O'Keefe releasing a series of clips that were later heavily edited to show him dressed in a pimp costume, getting advice from an ACORN staffer on how to run a prostitution business. At first hailed by mainstream reporters as a legit right-wing journalist exposé, O'Keefe's ACORN videos turned out to be a total fraud: they were staged and edited, and that fraud has resulted in ongoing lawsuits. But the damage was done: ACORN lost federal funding and was effectively destroyed.

The right lionizes O'Keefe as a pseudo-muckraking hero and undercover video sting whiz. But despite his alleged talents, the emails reveal that O'Keefe was not brought in on the planning of this operation. He was not tapped for his input, nor did he attempt offer any. He simply carried out orders from above.

Here's O'Keefe contacting someone named Mike Roman, John Fund's "credible" source for the SEIU fraud tip:
From: "James E. O'Keefe III"
Date: January 13, 2010 4:16:14 PM EST
To: "mike roman"
Subject: Re: ACORN videos / seiu / election
Mike,
Got your info from John Fund.
I was the producer of the ACORN Videos
Would like to know whereabouts of the busses in Boston SEIU, et al are using in order to bus people in to vote in the Tuesday special election.
Thinking about sending some undercover folks up there.
James
2016370564
O’Keefe must have worked all through the night carrying out Steve Friess’ orders, because by next morning the operation was already set to go. O’Keefe had already picked a black conservative activist named Nadia Naffe, who had been recruited earlier into O'Keefe's band of rightwing media grunts, to take part in the SEIU sting—just like Steve Friess ordered.

O’Keefe, it turns out, was just a smear-lackey, eagerly carrying out a race-baiting assignment on orders from a billionaire's son. But you would't know it by the way O'Keefe started strutting around like a Big Shot, trying to impress Naffe as if he was the man in charge.

Striking a mysterious and dangerous tone, O’Keefe wrote Naffe that he wouldn't be able to take part in this particular bust because he would be in "new orleans causing trouble" but that he might be "willing" to buy her a plane ticket and send her on the assignment, but only if she was "interested in making some more video history" and that he was "confident in her training."
From: "James E. O'Keefe III"
Date: January 14, 2010 11:10:49 PM EST
To: nknaffe@xxxxx.com
Cc: Stan Dai
Subject: Boston
Nadia,
We're willing to book you a plane ticket to Boston to get some footage from the SEIU busses. Joe will be joining you taking care of logistics/equipment--- but i'll be in new orleans causing trouble. im confident your training will take you far.
Interested in making some more video history?
James
For all that strutting around, James O'Keefe's "operation" in New Orleans turned out to be a massive fuck-up. Shortly after sending that email, he was arrested with three of his sidekicks as they tried to bug the offices of Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu—all of them dressed up like Village People's construction workers.

It was a serious federal crime—a felony that carried a 10-year term. Luckily, O'Keefe's lawyer was a connected Republican Party operative who had been involved in investigating both Watergate and the Clinton administration. He was able to get O'Keefe's felony reduced to a misdemeanor. O'Keefe didn't get any jail time -- just three years probation, a $1,500 fine and some community service.
Probation and a small fine? In California you'd get a harsher punishment for driving drunk.

Meanwhile, in Boston, the operation against the SEIU was only marginally more successful. Naffe and her team of Friess-funded operatives collected useless footage of the SEIU going about its lawful business. “There was no video to come out of Massachusetts because there was no voter fraud to be found,” Naffe told Breitbart's Deep Throat. "The SEIU workers told me that if I wanted to register to vote in Massachusetts I had already missed the deadline. And there was no bus, no SEIU busing anybody in anywhere.”

Yep, Fund’s intel was bunk.

Despite the money and the effort, Stevie Friess' billionaire aristobrat dreams went unfulfilled. But his daddy probably wasn't upset about having to dish out money on the operation. After all, he'd still be able to write the expense off his taxes as a charitable contribution. It's always win-win in daddy Friess' billionaire world.
* * * *
Unsurprisingly, the SEIU operation wasn't the only time O'Keefe was acting on orders from on high.
"I figured out quickly after meeting James that he was not the brains behind this operation," says Naffe, a Harvard graduate student who worked with O'Keefe's Project Veritas during 2010 and 2011, and who recently sued O’Keefe for imprisonment against her will in his parents' barn.

"There were so many phone calls from so many different people giving him directions. Different voices would say ‘throw in the silliness factor,’ or [during O'Keefe's Maxine Waters project] ‘tell ‘em you’ve got a suitcase full of cash and you want to give it to her and you want the bank to facilitate the transfer so that it looks like she’s putting money down on the house when it’s actually you putting money down on the house.’ And so on. It was constant.”

Naffe says O’Keefe received specific orders from the Koch-funded Americans For Prosperity on how to edit a video. Americans for Prosperity is one of the main groups that orchestrated the Tea Party movement back in 2009. Naffe remembers seeing one email from AFP’s Texas office telling O'Keefe's to remove a clip from a video he was making that showed Governor Rick Perry declaring Medicare fraud was not a problem in Texas.

“When James was sending it out to a group of people to get their take on it and presumably to raise money, the AFP field director in Texas wrote to him, ‘You need to take Governor Perry out of this video,’” says Naffe. “It didn’t sound like it was advice to me, it sounded like a directive. It just confirmed what I had started to suspect, that he is just the Koch Brothers’ bitch.”

After his brief 2009 ACORN pimp victory, O’Keefe was portrayed in the news as an a independent right-wing muckraker, a scrappy kid who came out of nowhere and suddenly rose to fame and fortune by exposing corruption. It was a classic American up-by-his bootstraps kinda success story. The New York Times described O'Keefe as a "25-year-old video provocateur," a "gadfly" who "began his film making career with a more modest target: Lucky Charms."

But almost from the very beginning it was clear that O’Keefe was no independent operator.

If the New York Times had bothered to do even a tiny bit of reporting, it would have discovered that his ACORN videos were underwritten by Peter Thiel, an ultra-libertarian billionaire and a very active sponsor of free market and Republican Party causes. Thiel, who was an early investor in Facebook, isn’t just a far-right ideologue, he also co-founded Palantir, a lucrative business providing hi-tech espionage services to a long list of government and defense agencies, including the CIA, FBI, Department of Defense. More money for O'Keefe's videos came through Andrew Breitbart's operation (Breitbart promised O'Keefe $65,000 for “life rights” to the ACORN series). It's not clear where the pimp idea for taking down ACORN came from, but it wasn't from O'Keefe or Breitbart.

Unfortunately, my source could only get access to a small batch of O'Keefe/Breitbart emails. But even from that small sample, it's clear that orders flowed only in one direction: from the top down.
Even WSJ's op-ed lackey John Fund, who puts in regular appearances in discussions about rightwing media smear operations, enjoys a higher rank than Breitbart did and O'Keefe does. For example: Four days before John Fund's email triggered the failed SEIU operation, here's Fund suggesting an operation directly to Andrew Breitbart, who then forwarded the idea on to O’Keefe:
From: Andrew Breitbart
Date: Friday, January 8, 2010
Subject: Fwd: maybe Big Hollywood should send a spy
To: "James E. O'Keefe III"
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Fund, John"
Date: January 8, 2010 9:18:22 AM PSTTo: "'andrew@breitbart.com '"
Subject: maybe Big Hollywood should send a spy [emphasis added by NSFWCORP]
From: Stephanie Schell [mailto:xxxxxx@grammy.com ] On Behalf Of News from The Recording Academy
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:17 PM
Subject: SEN. BARBRA BOXER KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT GRAMMY FOUNDATION'S ELI
NEWS RELEASE SEN BARBARA BOXER TO DELIVER KEYNOTE ADDRESS AT GRAMMY FOUNDATION®'S 12TH ANNUAL ENTERTAINMENT LAW INITIATIVE® LUNCHEON & SCHOLARSHIP PRESENTATION
[TEXT OF PRESS RELEASE]
Sending a spy to a Grammy Foundation event? Man, John Fund's really scraping the barrel here. No wonder this idea never made it to Foster Friess.

But O'Keefe clearly bought into the whole "spy" business. A few months after he was arrested in New Orleans, O'Keefe sent an email to his team of disgraced media operatives on how they could improve their craft for future assignments. The email excerpted a Wired article describing of the tactics of Canadian master thief Gerald Blanchard (highlights are in the original):
From: "James E. O'Keefe III"
Date: April 1, 2010 4:12:02 AM EDT
To: Ben Wetmore, Joe Basel, Jonathon Burns, o2a2star@xxxxx.com, atticus52185@xxxxx.com, nknaffe@xxxxxx.com
Subject: Fascinating: Gerald Blanchard Disguise Tactics - highlights in BOLD
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_masterthief_blanchard
"Blanchard also learned how to turn himself into someone else. Sometimes it was just a matter of donning a yellow hard hat from Home Depot. But it could also be more involved. Eventually, Blanchard used legitimate baptism and marriage certificates — filled out with his assumed names — to obtain real driver’s licenses. He would even take driving tests, apply for passports, or enroll in college classes under one of his many aliases: James Gehman, Daniel Wall, or Ron Aikins. With the help of makeup, glasses, or dyed hair, Blanchard gave James, Daniel, Ron, and the others each a different look.
Over the years, Blanchard procured and stockpiled IDs and uniforms from various security companies and even law enforcement agencies Sometimes, just for fun and to see whether it would work, he pretended to be a reporter so he could hang out with celebrities. […]
"As the bank was being built, Blanchard frequently sneaked inside — sometimes at night, sometimes in broad daylight, disguised as a delivery person or construction worker. There’s less security before the money shows up, and that allowed Blanchard to plant various surveillance devices in the ATM room. He knew when the cash machines were installed and what kind of locks they had. He ordered the same locks online and reverse engineered them at home. Later he returned to the Alberta Treasury to disassemble, disable, and remount the locks."
Who knows, maybe after another decade or so of Thiel-financed spycraft training, O'Keefe could become as good as Gerald Blanchard. But there's something that O'Keefe will never duplicate: Blanchard mostly stole from the powerful and rich —he robbed banks, milked ATMs and swiped priceless jewelry belonging to an Austrian Empress. "I felt guilty to a certain extent, but my reasoning behind it at the time was I'm not hurting individuals, I'm hurting corporations," Blanchard told Canadian TV.

O'Keefe is no master thief. He's a race-baiting fetch-boy who attacks minorities and the working poor on behalf of the degenerate rich.

5 Professional Tea Partiers: Who's Sucking the Most Money From the Movement?

Original Link: http://www.alternet.org/story/150902/5_professional_tea_partiers%3A_who%27s_sucking_the_most_money_from_the_movement

By Adele M. Stan

These five Tea Party leaders are nicely compensated for leading the allegedly leaderless movement.
It was supposed to be the most low-to-the-ground of grassroots movements, a spontaneous uprising, the story goes, of ordinary, fed-up Americans who, on their own time and with nothing more than a Google Groups listserv put together a national political juggernaut. Whatever the grassroots bona fides of local Tea Party groups, the national movement is in many ways the creation of well-compensated Republican political operatives and consultants. This week, they added one more to their ranks, when Judson Phillips, who founded Tea Party Nation, announced he would leave his law practice and draw a salary instead from his Tea Party group, as Roll Call reported.

When we looked at leaders of the best-known Tea Party groups, we found most making a rather handsome living off the ostensibly salt-of-the-earth movement. And despite the Tea Party mantra that women run the movement, we found that two of the best-known female faces of the movement -- Amy Kremer of Tea Party Express and Jenny Beth Martin of Tea Party Patriots -- earn rather modest salaries in comparison with their male colleagues. While Sal Russo, principal of Tea Party Express, raked in more than $800,000 during the 2010 election cycle from Tea Party Express for his public relations and media companies, Amy Kremer, the Express' director of grassroots and coalitions, earned a mere $49,000 during the same period, despite the fact that she often represents Tea Party Express at rallies and in the media. Meanwhile, Jenny Beth Martin, national coordinator of Tea Party Patriots, the successful organization founded by FreedomWorks, takes in $72,000 a year, a middling level of compensation when compared with the six-figure salaries reaped by FreedomWorks' male leaders.

Below, a look at the leaders of some of the best-known Tea Party-branded organizations, and the slick political backgrounds of the men who lead them -- guys more likely to be donning finely tailored suits than tricorn hats.

Dick Armey, chairman, FreedomWorks and FreedomWorks Foundation. Thanks in part to his status as former House Majority Leader, Armey is living the good life at the helm of these two Tea Party-rallying non-profits. According to the FreedomWorks Foundation's IRS filings for 2009 (the most recent year available), Armey earns a total of $500,000 per year for his work on behalf of both organizations, which, for the most part, share the same staff. (When I attended a FreedomWorks event last September, Armey arrived in a chauffered limousine.)

FreedomWorks, together with Americans for Prosperity (see Tim Phillips, below), was instrumental in ginning up opposition to President Barack Obama's health-care legislation, including the orchestration of disruptive attendees at congressional town-hall meetings. Both FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity stem from a single, now defunct, organization, Citizens for a Sound Economy, which was founded by the billionaire David Koch.

During the 2010 midterm elections, FreedomWorks allied closely with the picks of the Senate Conservatives Fund, spearheaded by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., seeking to create a "power center" of Tea Party-allied senators around DeMint, according to FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon. FreedomWorks is now conducting a campaign to make Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Tenn., appoint DeMint to the powerful Senate Finance Committee, now that the disgraced Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., has left the body in an effort to avoid further scrutiny by the Ethics Committee for an affair he had with a staffer, and his role in an apparent pay-off to the staffer's family.

In the Tennessee Republican primary for U.S. Senate, Armey backed Rand Paul -- who opposes some of the desegregation provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act -- against McConnell's pick, Trey Grayson, leaving McConnell significantly weakened in the face of DeMint's growing power by the time Paul won the seat.

Matt Kibbe, president, FreedomWorks and Freedom Works Foundation.
Kibbe's combined compensation for his positions at FreedomWorks and its foundation -- and "affiliated groups" -- added up to $308,097, according to the foundation's 2009 tax filings.

Kibbe's roots as a Republican strategist and wonk run deep; he served as chief of staff for Rep. Dan Miller, R-Fla., and as Miller's associate on the House Budget Committee. But it was at Lee Atwater's feet that Kibbe may have learned his most important political lessons; he served as the Republican National Committee's senior economist during Atwater's tenure as RNC chairman, a post Atwater won after successfully using a race-baiting strategy to secure the presidency for George H.W. Bush in 1988. As Bush's campaign chairman, Atwater commissioned the notorious "Willie Horton" ad against Democrat Michael Dukakis. The ad used the image of a dark-skinned black man who committed murder while on a weekend release program to alienate white voters from Dukasis, and to paint him as soft on crime.

The Koch brothers have also long played a role in Kibbe's career. After serving as managing editor of Market Process, a journal published by the Koch-funded Center for Market Process (now folded into the Koch-funded Mercatus Institute) at George Mason University, Kibbe went on to join Citizens for a Sound Economy, which led to his current position at FreedomWorks.

Tim Phillips, president, Americans for Prosperity and Americans for Prosperity Foundation.
With an annual compensation of $252,918, according to 2009 tax filings by the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, veteran political operative Tim Phillips may not be riding quite as high as Armey and Kibbe, but he's not exactly sweating the mortgage.

After serving as campaign manager and chief of staff to Rep. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia from 1992-96, Phillips joined former Christian Coalition executive director Ralph Reed in forming Century Strategies, the political consulting firm implicated in the Jack Abramoff bribery scandal. At Century Strategies, Phillips conducted organizing efforts for the 2000 presidential campaign of George W. Bush.

Like FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity was born of the crack-up of Citizens for a Sound Economy. One major difference between the two organizations is that FreedomWorks claims not to receive any money from the Koch brothers, while the AFP Foundation is chaired by David Koch, the major funder of both AFP and its foundation.

Sal Russo, principal, Tea Party Express. Russo is an old political hand, who, according to the Los Angeles Times, "cut his first political ad in 1969 as a 23-year-old aide to then-Gov. Ronald Reagan, dispatched to California's Salinas Valley to help a local apricot farmer win a state Assembly seat."

Russo went on to become a force in California politics, working for Gov. George Deukmejian. In the 2008 presidential campaign, he launched the Our Country Deserves Better Political Action Committee, launching ads against Barack Obama that questioned the Democrat's patriotism. When the fires of the Tea Party movement took off, Russo morphed Our Country Deserves Better into the Tea Party Express.

Though best known for its election-season bus tours featuring Tea Party figures who boost Tea Party-allied candidates (including the execrable Carl Paladino, the racist who ran against Andrew Cuomo in New York's gubernatorial race), the power of Tea Party Express stems from its status as a PAC, as seen in the 2010 midterm elections. Almost single-handedly, Tea Party Express ensured the primary successes of U.S. Senate candidates Christine O'Donnell, Del.; Joe Miller, Alaska; and Sharron Angle, Nev. (All went on to lose the general elections, but their primary victories nonetheless pushed the GOP further to the right.) During the primary season, according to the L.A. Times, "the PAC dropped nearly $600,000 in Alaska on ads that boosted Joe Miller over Sen. Lisa Murkowski, and racked up $944,000 in advertising in Nevada backing Sharron Angle."

But what's good for Tea Party Express is also very good for Sal Russo's own pockets. As a principal in Russo Marsh & Associates and King Media, Russo is able to use Tea Party Express to contract his own for-profit entities, and to pay them out of TPE donations -- and he does.

In the 2010 election cycle, businesses in which Russo has a financial interest reaped at least $845,000, according to my back-of-the-envelope estimate, which is drawn from a list of Tea Party Express expenditures at OpenSecrets.org. (This includes payments to staff and/or principals of Russo Marsh.)

Judson Phillips, founder and principal, Tea Party Nation.
Defense attorney and former Tennessee District Attorney Judson Phillips just announced that he is leaving his day job as a defense attorney for clients charged with drunk driving in order to work full-time for his controversial for-profit Tea Party Nation corporation. Phillips told Roll Call that he'll draw a salary that is "under six figures," but for all we know, that could be $99,999. Never mind that Phillips stiffed Tea Partiers who paid to attend a planned "Tea Party Unity" convention in Las Vegas that never came off last October. (In an April 16 e-mail to those who paid for convention tickets, Phillips wrote, "As we have been generating revenue, we have been making refunds. We are slowly making progress. Our commitment remains that everyone who purchased a ticket to the convention will receive a refund.")

Whatever organizing prowess Phillips lacks, he's proven to have a knack for winning publicity for controversial statements (such as his suggestion that only property owners should be allowed to vote). At his Nashville Tea Party Nation convention in February 2010, Phillips endorsed Tom Tancredo, then running for a Colorado Senate seat, even after the candidate told the convening Tea Partiers that literacy tests should be re-instituted as a requirement for voters. (Literacy tests were often the means used to keep African Americans from voting before the Voting Rights Act passed in 1963.)

The Nashville Tea Party Nation convention became a matter of great controversy, both for its high attendance fee ($549), from which Phillips expected to reap a profit, and for the reported $100,000 speaking fee paid to Sarah Palin to keynote the conference. The outcry prompted Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., to withdraw from her spot at the convention, and led Palin to pledge to donate the fee to charity.

Tea Party Nation's core business, however, is not its conferences, but its right-wing social networking site of the same name. If Phillips can turn that into the Next Big Thing in right-wing media, his salary will mark but a small portion of the fruits of his labor.

Sunday, December 23, 2012

How Much Did Sheldon Adelson Really Spend on Campaign 2012?

Original Link: http://www.propublica.org/article/how-much-did-sheldon-adelson-really-spend-on-campaign-2012

By Theodoric Meyer

Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino magnate and emblem of the Citizens United-era of campaign finance, spent gobs of money on the 2012 elections — more money than anyone else in American history.
Exactly how much, you ask?

We don't really know, and it's likely we never will. Many of the groups that spent the most on the election aren't required to report their donors. But thanks to recent campaign finance filings, we can get a better idea.

We dug through Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service records and found that Adelson and his wife, Miriam, spent at least $98 million this election cycle. The money went to at least 34 different candidates and groups, with contributions ranging from $2,000 for a Florida congressional candidate to $30 million for Restore Our Future, the super PAC that supported Mitt Romney.

Adelson also gave $20 million to Winning Our Future, a super PAC backing Newt Gingrich; $23 million to American Crossroads, a conservative super PAC; and $5 million each to the Congressional Leadership Fund and the YG Action Fund, both of which supported Republican candidates for Congress.

One of the more puzzling contributions was a $1 million check Adelson wrote in October. The money went to Hardworking Americans, a super PAC that attacked Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat who had a big lead in the polls and was re-elected three weeks later by a 21-point margin.

A spokesman for Adelson's company, Las Vegas Sands, did not respond to a request for comment.

The $98 million figure matches up with the $100 million that Adelson, who is worth a reported $21 billion, had vowed to spend to defeat President Obama. But it doesn't include the checks he wrote to "dark-money" groups — organizations that don't have to disclose their donors, making their spending harder to track. These groups have proliferated since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the door to unlimited corporate and union giving.

The Huffington Post recently reported that Adelson's total spending may have approached $150 million.
Two anonymous Republican fundraisers told the Huffington Post that Adelson had given between $30 and $40 million to Crossroads GPS, the dark-money group founded by Karl Rove, and at least $15 million to groups affiliated with Charles and David Koch, the billionaire industrialist brothers. Adelson also gave millions to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Republican Jewish Coalition, the fundraisers said.

If accurate, those numbers would place Adelson's total spending on the election at around $155 million.

Correction: The original version of this story overstated the amount of Sheldon and Miriam Adelson's election spending that can be tracked through public records. It is at least $98 million, not $101 million. The original story did not take into account a $5 million donation to the super PAC Winning Our Future that was refunded Miriam Adelson, which lowered their total spending, as well as several state-level contributions.

Adelson gave $40 million to super PACs in final weeks of election

Original Link: http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/12/21/11950/adelson-gave-40-million-super-pacs-final-weeks-election

By

Top 25 donors supplied more than a third of super PAC cash

Billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and family poured nearly $40 million into the coffers of GOP-aligned super PACs In the final three weeks of the 2012 campaign, bringing their total giving to the groups to more than $93 million.

Adelson ranks as the top donor to the outside spending groups by a wide margin, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis of campaign finance records.

Super PACs raised roughly $830 million in the 2012 election, with conservative groups accounting for about 60 percent of the total, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

By contrast, President Barack Obama’s presidential campaign raised nearly $720 million and Republican challenger Mitt Romney’s raised almost $450 million, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
In all, the top 25 super PAC super donors doled out more than $310 million, about 37 percent of all super PAC receipts, according to the Center’s analysis of data from the FEC and Center for Responsive Politics. Ninety-one individuals gave at least $1 million to super PACs and collectively donated more than $330 million, according to the analysis.

The unlimited donations, which are used primarily to fund candidate attack ads, concern advocates such as Stephen Spaulding, staff counsel at Common Cause.

“People are able to distort the political process, open doors and be kingmakers simply because of the size of their bank account,” he said. “The threat of the spending just hangs over all the political decisions that are happening on [Capitol] Hill.”

After focusing primarily on the presidential contest, in the final weeks of the campaign, Adelson ramped up his giving to GOP-aligned super PACs active in House and Senate races.

In Virginia alone, Adelson invested $4 million into a super PAC that ran attack ads against Democrat Tim Kaine in the final days of the election.

His million-dollar contribution to a super PAC called the “Hardworking Americans Committee” accounted for the bulk of the money used in an unsuccessful last-ditch effort to defeat incumbent Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.

And a GOP-aligned super PAC known as the “America 360 Committee” received $500,000 from the Adelsons as it touted incumbent Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and criticized Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren in telephone calls and mailings.

Despite the spending, however, Democrats prevailed in the most contentious races — including battles for U.S. Senate seats in Massachusetts and Virginia.

Adelson’s donations to super PACs — which can accept unlimited donations from individuals, corporations and unions — set a new standard in political giving.

Texas businessman Harold Simmons, the billionaire owner of Contran Corp., ranked a distant second among super donors, giving $30.9 million, including donations from his company and wife, Annette Simmons.
One of Simmons' business ventures includes a site in West Texas built to store nuclear waste. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently debating rules that could result in sizeable contracts for Simmons' company.

Another Texan, millionaire Bob Perry, ranked third, giving $23.5 million to conservative super PACs. Perry is the owner of Perry Homes and an advocate for the business-led effort to limit damages awarded in lawsuits.

Millionaires and billionaires pepper the Center’s list of the top 25 super donors. The list also includes seven unions and the Republican Governors Association, a so-called “527 committee” that used a super PAC to direct funds into state races. None of these donors broke the $20 million mark.

Billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, No. 9, was a new addition to the list. Bloomberg gave more than $10 million to a group he launched called Independence USA PAC, whose priorities include stronger gun control laws and marriage equality for same-sex couples.

Other new additions to the Center’s list of top donors include:
Rose’s companies — Specialty Investments Group, Inc., and Kingston Pike Development, LLC— both list their address as Rose’s $634,000 private home outside of Knoxville, Tenn. Both were registered with the state of Tennessee in late September, and neither have websites.

Rose, after intense press scrutiny, went public saying Specialty’s mission is to "buy, sell, develop and invest in a variety of real estate ventures and investments." Rose released a lengthy press release, but did not indicate where the money for the donations originated.

Rose did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

The top Democratic-aligned super donor was Chicago media mogul Fred Eychaner, who gave $14.1 million over the course of the election cycle, split among five groups. That sum earned him the No. 4 spot on the Center’s top 25 list.

The pro-Obama Priorities USA Action super PAC collected $4.5 million from Eychaner, ranking as his top beneficiary. He also backed Majority PAC, House Majority PAC, Women Vote!, the super PAC of abortion rights advocacy group EMILY’s List, and America Votes Action Fund, a super PAC that funded get-out-the-vote efforts.

Liberal billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros* made it on the list, donating about $2.8 million split among four Democratic groups. His children Andrea, Alexander and Jonathan also each donated six-figure sums to Democratic super PACs, as did his daughter-in-law Melissa, bringing the family’s total giving to $5.1 million, enough to rank 18th.

Soros' children collectively gave $1.1 million to the pro-campaign finance reform super PAC "Friends of Democracy," which was launched by Jonathan Soros.

This is a far cry from the $23.7 million Soros donated during the 2004 election to 527 groups — the predecessors of super PACs — when he ranked as the top 527 committee financier, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Despite fears to the contrary, donations from blue-chip corporations were rare, although a month before the election, Chevron, the third-largest American company according to Forbes, donated $2.5 million to a Republican super PAC closely allied with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

One of the largest, high-profile corporate donors was Weaver Holdings, the parent company of the Indiana-popcorn company known for its brands “Pop Weaver” and “Trail’s End,” which is sold by Boy Scouts across the country. Weaver Holdings, along with Weaver Popcorn, donated $3.4 million to American Crossroads, including $1 million during the final three weeks of the election.

American Crossroads was co-founded by GOP strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie.

Unlike traditional political action committees, there is no limit on contributions to super PACs. They emerged following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision and a federal court ruling called SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission.

Adelson is a staunch ally of Israel and an opponent of unions. He first hit the news when he and his relatives pumped more than $16 million into a super PAC that supported former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s failed bid for the Republican nomination for president.

He and his wife Miriam gave $30 million to the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future, which accounted for nearly 20 percent of the nearly $154 million raised by the group.

In late October, the Adelsons also gave $23 million to American Crossroads, their first donations to the group. Crossroads spent more than $90 million in an unsuccessful effort to help Romney oust Obama.
Roughly two-thirds of Adelson’s $93 million went to super PACs that backed just one or two specific candidates. None of Adelson’s preferred candidates prevailed in any of the 10 races in which these super PACs were active.

Earlier this month, a defiant Adelson told the Wall Street Journal that he would spend even more money in future elections.

"I happen to be in a unique business where winning and losing is the basis of the entire business," Adelson told the newspaper. "I don't cry when I lose. There's always a new hand coming up."

Rank Name Total Given Ideology
1 Sheldon Adelson & family (see profile) $93.3 million Republican
2 Harold Simmons & wife, companies (see profile) $30.9 million Republican
3 Bob Perry (see profile) $23.5 million Republican
4 Fred Eychaner (see profile) $14.1 million Democratic
5 Joe Ricketts (see profile) $13.1 million Republican
6 William S. Rose (Specialty Group) (see profile) $12.1 million Republican
7 United Auto Workers (see profile) $11.8 million Democratic
8 National Education Association (see profile) $10.8 million Democratic
9 Michael Bloomberg (see profile) $10 million Independent
10 Republican Governors Association (see profile) $9.8 million Republican
11 James H. Simons (see profile) $9.6 million Democratic
12 AFSCME (see profile) $8.2 million Democratic
13 AFL-CIO (see profile) $7.4 million Democratic
14 Robert B. Rowling (see profile) $6.1 million Republican
15 American Federation of Teachers (see profile) $5.8 million Democratic
16 Robert Mercer (see profile) $5.5 million Republican
17 Steve and Amber Mostyn (see profile) $5.2 million Democratic
18 George Soros* & family (see profile) $5.1 million Democratic
19 William Koch (see profile) $4.8 million Republican
20 Peter Thiel (see profile) $4.7 million Republican
21 SEIU (see profile) $4.4 million Democratic
21 Joe Craft (see profile) $4.4 million Republican
23 John Childs (see profile) $4.2 million Republican
23 Plumbers and Pipefitters Union (see profile) $4.2 million Democratic
25 Jerry Perenchio (see profile) $4.1 million Republican

*George Soros is the chairman of the Open Society Foundation, which provides funding for the Center for Public Integrity. See a list of the Center's donors.

Source/Methodology: Center for Responsive Politics and Center for Public Integrity analysis of Federal Election Commission records. Totals include contributions from individuals, family members and corporations that are controlled by the individual super donor. Totals reflect donations made during the 2011-2012 election cycle, through Nov. 26.